Poster Presentation AANZGOSA-SUGSS ASM 2024

The clinical utility of multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with complex benign upper gastrointestinal conditions: An audit of service (#32)

Matthew GR Allaway 1 , Frank Luo 1 , Kiron Bhatia 1 , Krinal Mori 1 , Alex Craven 1 , Ben Keong 1 , Chek Tog 1 , Tom Sweeney 1 , Darren Wong 1 , Michelle Goodwin 1 , Christopher Leung 1 , Ahmad Aly 1 , Katheryn Hall 1 , David Liu 1
  1. Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia

Background

Patients with benign upper gastrointestinal (UGI) conditions such as achalasia, gastroparesis and refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) often suffer from debilitating symptoms. These conditions can be complex and challenging to diagnose and treat, making them well suited for discussion within a multidisciplinary meeting (MDM). There is however a paucity of data describing the value of a benign UGI MDM. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of our unit’s benign UGI MDM service and its outcomes.

 

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for all consecutive patients reviewed in the monthly benign UGI MDM between July 2021 to February 2024. The primary outcome was the incidence that MDM review changed clinical treatment. Secondary outcomes included change in diagnosis, additional investigations and referrals to subspecialists.

 

Results

104 patients met inclusion criteria. 73 (70.2%) patients had a change in their overall management following MDM review; 25 (24.0%), 31 (29.8%) and 48 (46.2%) patients had changes in pharmacological, endoscopic and surgical interventions respectively. Most changes in pharmacological and endoscopic intervention involved treatment escalation, whereas most changes in surgical intervention involved treatment de-escalation. 84 (80.8%) patients had a documented diagnosis post-MDM with 44 (42.3%) having a change in their pre-MDM diagnosis. 50 (48.1%) patients had additional investigation/s requested and 49 (47.1%) had  additional referral pathway/s recommended.

 

Conclusions

Over two thirds of patients had at least once aspect of their management plan changed following MDM review. These changes occurred across pharmacological, endoscopic and surgical interventions.